Music

by Jag Singh


The eras and their music:

Medieval (500-1400)

Click here to listen to the music referenced on this page

The era is defined by sacred and mystical vocal music of monophonic (single melody) chants that later evolved into polyphony (many melodies). The era is represented by Hildegard of Bingen (1098-1179), a mystic and abbess whose ecstatic, monophonic chants were transcribed directly from divine visions.

Music:

Renaissance (1400-1600)

Click here to listen to the music referenced on this page

The era is defined by polyphonic music (many melodies) that includes four to five interweaving voices supporting and enhancing each other. The era is represented by Josquin des Prez (1450-1521), a master of the Franco-Flemish school who pioneered the art of matching music to the emotional meaning of the text.

Music:

Baroque (1600-1750)

Click here to listen to the music referenced on this page

The era is defined by counterpoint where independent stories of multiple characters (soprano, alto, tenor, bass) are woven together creating friction and debate before converging at the end. This differs from the Renaissance polyphony where all the voices make supporting statements. The era is represented by Johann Sebastian Bach (1685-1750), a master of counterpoint who died in 1750 when there was nothing more left to explore or evolve in the Baroque counterpoint style.

Music:

Conclusion

The World as Will and Representation, 1859, by Arthur Schopenhauer:
The (Platonic) Ideas are the adequate objectification of the will. To stimulate the knowledge of these by depicting individual things (for works of art are themselves always such) is the aim of all the other arts (and is possible with a corresponding change in the knowing subject). Hence all of them objectify the will only indirectly, in other words, by means of the Ideas. As our world is nothing but the phenomenon or appearance of the Ideas in plurality through entrance into the principium individuationis (the form of knowledge possible to the individual as such), music, since it passes over the Ideas, is also quite independent of the phenomenal world, positively ignores it, and, to a certain extent, could still exist even if there were no world at all, which cannot be said of the other arts. Thus music is as immediate an objectification and copy of the whole will as the world itself is, indeed as the Ideas are, the multiplied phenomenon of which constitutes the world of individual things. Therefore music is by no means like the other arts, namely a copy of the Ideas, but a copy of the will itself, the objectivity of which are the Ideas. For this reason the effect of music is so very much more powerful and penetrating than is that of the other arts, for these others speak only of the shadow, but music of the essence.